|
Fish Barrier Prioritisation (Landscape Scale Coastal, no economic analysis)Search fields
Description and method logicMethod purposeThe objective of this method is to identify and assess anthropogenic physical barriers (biophysical, such as weed chokes, are not considered) that prevent, delay, or obstruct fish migration in coastal catchments. Fish barriers identified through this process are ranked in order of priority, accounting for the cumulative impacts barriers have on the environment, fisheries resources, the economy, and the local community. Fisheries productivity benefits of barrier remediation are also considered.
SummaryThis method systematically identifies all potential physical barriers to fish passage in a study area. The top ranked barriers in the study areas have remediation options costed to facilitate adoption of fish barrier remediation by local governments and natural resource management (NRM) groups. A holistic prioritisation process is used to objectively choose barriers to remediate to obtain the greatest benefits. This holistic process assists decisionmakers in determining where to best allocate funding opportunities to ensure the greatest environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for the study area. The assessment incorporates the impact on fish movement, location in the catchment (stream order) and surrounding land use in the first stage. The second stage incorporates an assessment of habitat condition and the third stage incorporates the social, conservation, and fisheries productivity benefits of barrier remediation at each site. This method does not include an economic assessment, see Fish Barrier Prioritisation (Landscape Scale/Coastal, with economic analysis) for the method that includes an economic assessment.
Method logicBarriers to fish passage such as dams, weirs, causeways, culverts, earthen bunds and floodgates can impact the health of river systems by altering natural flow regimes, and causing impassable barriers to aquatic fauna, especially fish. High value fish species, both ecologically and economically, are in decline due to barriers impeding strict migratory life-cycle strategies (i.e. feeding, recruitment) which requires unimpeded access between habitats (i.e. between inland freshwater habitats and estuary/marine habitats).
This method’s objective is to identify and assess physical anthropogenic barriers that prevent, delay, or obstruct fish migration in coastal catchments. Fish barriers identified through this process are ranked in order of priority, accounting for the cumulative impacts barriers have on the environment, fisheries resources, economy, and local community. The aim is to remediate barriers preventing connectivity, and this method assists decision makers in choosing which barriers to focus on, because there are large numbers of barriers in many coastal catchments that outweigh the resources available to remediate. This method identifies and prioritises barriers through 3 major stages. Stage 1. Catchment Scale: GIS Analysis – Spatial & Temporal Habitat Characteristics The first stage systematically identifies all potential barriers to fish passage in the study area. This is done through a desktop, catchment-scale GIS analysis of biological, geographic and environmental characteristics associated with each potential barrier to produce a prioritised list for ground-truthing. Stage 2 – Fine Scale: Site- Specific Ecological Assessment (includes field validation) The second stage performs a fine-scale, site specific barrier assessment to validate, score and rank priority barriers based on passability, configuration, in-stream habitat availability and flow conditions. Stage 3 – Analysis The third stage further refines and prioritises barriers based on social, conservation, and fisheries productivity benefits. The top ranked fish barriers, depending on the area (can vary from 20 to 50), are listed with remediation options and indicative costs. This list is then available for adoption by State and local governments and natural resource management groups. The holistic prioritisation process makes this selection effective and applicable straightaway. Criteria groupings of the method
Stage 1 Catchment Scale: GIS Analysis – Spatial & Temporal Habitat Characteristics
Stage 3 Analysis
Data required
Resources requiredExpertise requiredExpert knowledge of riverine fauna ecology including life cycle and habitat requirements. Field assessment skills, and GIS data analysis skills. Knowledge of fisheries in the study area, including any listing under environmental legislation. Research skills to get baseline information about fish species in the study area.
Materials requiredGeographic Information System for barrier identification and prioritisation.
High quality imagery (satellite/drone) Species lists Spatial data Method outputsOutputsStage 1 Desktop Analysis: All potential physical barriers in the study area are identified and a dataset is produced with a unique geo-referenced identification number. A prioritised list for ground-truthing (field assessment) is produced.
Stage 2 Field Assessment: A second list of physical barriers is produced, from refining the list in Stage 1. This list scores physical barriers according ecological criteria and contains site specific information about the barrier. Stage 3 Analysis: A third list of physical barriers is produced from refining the list in Stage 2. This stage scores physical barriers based on social, conservation, and fisheries productivity criteria. The scores are collated from each stage to identify the top-ranked (highest score) barrier in the study area. A final list of the top ranked fish barriers in the study area is produced, which also show remediation options (fishway options) and indicative costs. Uses
Criteria by category
Physical and chemicalEconomicSignificanceEcosystem/habitatReviewRecommended userDesigned for state, or local government agencies, water utilities, and natural resource management groups.
Strengths
Limitations
Case studies2021 Fish Barrier Prioritisation – Mackay Whitsunday RegionPower, Trent, Moore, Matt, Fries, Jakob, Rossitor, Colin (2022) 2021 Fish Barrier Prioritisation – Mackay Whitsunday Region. © Catchment Solutions Pty Limited 2022, Mackay Queensland
Fish Barrier Prioritisation – Murray and Lower Herbert RiversMoore, Matt. Fries, Jakob., Power, Trent (2021) Fish Barrier Prioritisation – Murray and Lower Herbert Rivers, Catchment Solutions, Mackay, Queensland
References
Last updated: 27 January 2022 This page should be cited as: Department of Environment, Science and Innovation, Queensland (2022) Fish Barrier Prioritisation (Landscape Scale Coastal, no economic analysis), WetlandInfo website, accessed 30 August 2024. Available at: https://wetlandinfo.des.qld.gov.au/wetlands/resources/tools/assessment-search-tool/fish-barrier-prioritisation-landscape-scale-coastal-no-economic-analysis/ |